It was only until I was told by another person that I actually found this possible. Can the
constant change of shots taking on different angles actually make the portrayal of an action more confusing when its sole purpose is to do the exact opposite?
The example in this case would be America’s Best Dance Crew. Obviously this show appeals to dancers all around and before this show came on, they would learn and watch off the internet (Youtube). Checking most of these dance videos they most often use one shot and one camera motion; a Long Shot to portray the entire body and Handheld to avoid the hassle of having to set-up a shot. Knowing this, it makes it fairly reasonable to see why some people who watch this show have a hard time or are annoyed following the dance which proves the question stated in the beginning.
And as said in the beginning, I never found this to be possible. This was until I thought through the realms of Film instead of TV Shows. Recalling most of the action movies that I’ve watched, ALL of them had a sequence or more of suspenseful music, rapid cuts and crashing sounds. This to me was a pain in some cases. An example of this would be the car chase scene in the Bourne Ultimatum where it is simply dominated by short reaction and insert shots. Just when you’re about able to analyze what is going on in the frame, it quickly cuts to another and you go through this same process until the sequence stops.
But these explanations may not be the same case to the other billions of people on this planet. So the question remains: Can the constant change of shots taking on different angles actually make the portrayal of an action more confusing when its sole purpose is to do the exact opposite? (316)
